FRAMEWORK STATUS GOVERNANCE™ — ERRATA
Corrections and Reconciliations to FSG-001, Following a Proposed Framework Status Register™
Reference: SAFECHAIN/DIR/2026/FSG-001-ERR-01 (Architecture Addendums™ Category A)
Author: Samantha Avril-Andreassen FRSA
Organisation: SAFECHAINN Ltd (Company No. 12038453)
PURPOSE
A proposed "Framework Status Register™" was checked against FSG-001 (Framework Status Governance™) and the current Architecture Application Index. This errata records the corrections needed before any such proposal is adopted, and the two reconciliations (Architecture Reserve, Dormant) that the proposal's new categories required against FSG-001's existing seven-status/five-role scheme.
This errata does not replace FSG-001. It corrects errors identified in a subsequent proposal and extends FSG-001's structural-role scheme by one category (Architecture Reserve). FSG-001's status definitions, the twelve-paper status table, and all notes on maturity assignments remain in force except where corrected below.
TITLE AND PAPER-NUMBER CORRECTIONS
Four title/number errors were identified, all within the Papers 22, 23, 32, 33 cluster — the same cluster corrected multiple times previously in this series (Note 3i and others). The pattern resembles a one-position shift among these four papers' titles.
Paper 1
Proposed title: "Participation Integrity™"
Correct title (FSG-001): The Participation Gap™
Note: "Participation Integrity™" is a real term, but belongs to the Methodology (Stage 1 integrity condition) and to Paper 9's domain — not Paper 1's title
Paper 22
Proposed title: "Accountability Gap™"
Correct title (FSG-001): The Accountability Paradox™
Note: "Accountability Gap™" is AAS-011's title for its application of Paper 22 — retained, scoped to AAS-011 only (PIR-002), not a standalone name for Paper 22 itself
Paper 23
Proposed title: "Responsibility Paradox™"
Correct title (FSG-001): The Implementation Paradox™
Note: "The Responsibility Paradox™" is Paper 33's title, not Paper 23's
Paper 33
Proposed title: "Power Paradox™"
Correct title (FSG-001): The Responsibility Paradox™
Note: "The Power Paradox™" is Paper 32's title, not Paper 33's. Application count (11) was correct; title was not
LAYER CORRECTIONS
Paper 37
Proposed layer: Layer 5
Correct layer (FSG-001): Layer 3 (Addendum 1)
Note: "Layer 5" does not exist in the Index. Paper 37 is an Addendum extension to Layer 3 (Note 3n/3o), not a fifth layer
APPLICATION COUNT CORRECTIONS
Paper 24
Proposed value: "Growing"
Correct value (FSG-001): 3
Note: FSG-001 records Paper 24 at 3 applications (AAS-013, AAS-014, AAS-015), classified "Developing" — the lowest count of the Papers 22-24 trilogy. "Growing" is a trend description, not an application count, and should not replace the figure
NEW CATEGORY RECONCILIATION: ARCHITECTURE RESERVE AND DORMANT
The proposal introduced two categories not in FSG-001's existing scheme (seven maturity statuses; five structural roles). Each was checked against all 19 Index papers.
Architecture Reserve
Outcome: ADDED — 6th structural role
Reasoning: Papers 2, 3, 8 — Foundational, approved, numbered Layer 1 papers deliberately not yet applied. FSG-001 originally classified these as maturity "Proposed (0 applications)", which is imprecise: "Proposed" (per FSG-001's own definition) means "concept exists, architecture-level definition pending or partial" — but Papers 2/3/8 have complete architecture-level definitions. "Architecture Reserve" as a structural role (alongside Capstone, Foundational, Sector Framework, Application Framework, Companion Framework) better describes these papers: fully defined, intentionally held in reserve pending a future AAS paper.
Dormant
Outcome: NOT ADOPTED
Reasoning: Proposed definition: "published but not currently applied, requires review." Checked against all 19 papers: none fit this description. The 11 actively-applied papers show no drop-off pattern, and the 8 unapplied papers (2, 3, 8, 34, plus the now-reclassified reserve framing) are better described by "Architecture Reserve" (2, 3, 8) or "Proposed — Capstone" (34, unchanged). "Dormant" is recorded here as a RESERVED status for future use, should a previously-active paper's applications cease — but is not assigned to any paper at this time.
FSG-001's structural-role scheme is accordingly extended to six roles: Capstone, Foundational, Sector Framework, Application Framework, Companion Framework, and (new) Architecture Reserve. Maturity statuses remain seven (Foundational, Active, Emerging, Developing, Proposed, Superseded, Retired); "Dormant" is recorded as a reserved-for-future status, currently unassigned.
CORRECTED TABLE (TWELVE-PAPER SUBSET, AS PROPOSED)
The same twelve-paper subset proposed, with all corrections applied. Figures match the current Architecture Application Index.
Paper 1 — The Participation Gap™
Layer: Layer 1
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 8
Last applied: AAS-009 (most recent)
Paper 5 — Legacy Harm Architecture™
Layer: Layer 1
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Emerging
Applications: 1
Last applied: AAS-015
Paper 9 — Disclosure Integrity™
Layer: Layer 2
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 11
Last applied: Multiple
Paper 22 — The Accountability Paradox™
Layer: Layer 3
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 7
Last applied: AAS-014 (most recent)
Paper 23 — The Implementation Paradox™
Layer: Layer 3
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 9
Last applied: Multiple
Paper 24 — The Predictability Paradox™
Layer: Layer 3
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Developing
Applications: 3
Last applied: AAS-015 (most recent)
Paper 25 — The Coordination Deficit™
Layer: Layer 3
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 10
Last applied: Multiple
Paper 26 — The Continuity Deficit™
Layer: Layer 3
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 14
Last applied: AAS-014 (most recent)
Paper 32 — The Power Paradox™
Layer: Layer 4
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Emerging
Applications: 1
Last applied: AAS-012
Paper 33 — The Responsibility Paradox™
Layer: Layer 4
Status: Foundational
Maturity: Active
Applications: 11
Last applied: AAS-015 (most recent)
Paper 34 — The Integrity Paradox™
Layer: Layer 4
Status: Foundational — Capstone
Maturity: Proposed
Applications: 0
Last applied: N/A
Paper 37 — The Cost of Institutional Failure™
Layer: Layer 3 (Addendum 1)
Status: Foundational (Addendum 1)
Maturity: Emerging
Applications: 1
Last applied: AAS-015
Papers 2, 3, and 8 — not in the proposed twelve-paper subset, but affected by the Architecture Reserve reconciliation — should be read as: Foundational, Architecture Reserve (structural role), 0 applications, per FSG-001's existing notes on maturity assignments (these remain "recorded as opportunities, not omissions," per RAR-002).
CONCLUSION
The proposed Framework Status Register™ identified one genuinely useful addition (Architecture Reserve, now incorporated into FSG-001's structural-role scheme) and one category considered but not currently applicable (Dormant, reserved for future use). All title, layer, and application-count figures in any future framework status table should match the corrected table above and FSG-001's twelve-paper table, both of which now agree.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
© 2026 Samantha Avril-Andreassen. All rights reserved.
SAFECHAINN Ltd (Company No. 12038453).
SAFECHAIN™ is a governance, safeguarding, institutional integrity and accountability architecture authored by Samantha Avril-Andreassen.
This document forms part of the SAFECHAIN™ Governance Series and should be read alongside:
Foundational Architecture Index™
Master Publication Register™
Framework Status Governance™ (FSG-001)
Terminology Governance Register™
Governance Dashboard™
Architecture Governance Index™
Governance Map™
Methodology Bridge™
The purpose of this Errata is to preserve architecture integrity by recording corrections, reconciliations and governance decisions affecting framework status classification and architecture alignment.
Register Authority Principle™
The SAFECHAIN™ Master Publication Register remains the authoritative source for:
framework status;
terminology status;
superseded-term control;
architecture alignment;
publication governance;
governance decisions.
Where any conflict exists between the original Framework Status Governance™ document and subsequent materials, the Register position prevails.
Version 1.0